I’ll be the first to admit that of all the Star Wars films,
Attack of the Clones took the longest for me to fully appreciate. In spite of
the fact that I still feel that it’s arguably the most well-crafted film in the
Saga, at least when it comes to symbolism, subtlety, and having a deeper
meaning beyond the space fantasy, I still enjoy most of the other films on a far
more visceral level than this one.
"Settle down, settle down!" |
However, that doesn’t mean that there was ever a time I actively
disliked the movie. On the contrary, even though it wasn’t my favorite and I
was a little let down after expecting another Phantom Menace, I still loved the
film from day one. Each film in the Saga has moments that count amongst my
absolute favorites not just in Star Wars, but in film in general.
One of these moments was among my favorites since my very
first viewing of Attack of the Clones back when I was 15 years old, and I am
shocked – Shocked! – that I have not heard anyone else discuss it yet. If
there’s one trait I share with the rest of my generation, it’s that I’m a
sucker for obscure references and post-modernism gags. Granted, this reference
moment is relatively small in the midst of a trio of consecutive overwhelming
action sequences. But this is clearly George Lucas being a film geek and
reaching out to the other film geeks in the audience.
Have you ever noticed that in a lot of older films that used
stop-motion animation to insert large monsters into live action settings, said
monsters would often die when one of the human characters shoved a spear into
its pectorals? It was such a prevalent trope that I’m surprised that I can’t
find a TVTropes entry on it (if I’ve missed it, please point me in the
direction, no pun intended). Whether it’s a Tyrannosaur or a mythical beast, it
seems in these films that all it takes is one clumsily thrown spear to take
them down. It was often rather hilarious.
"It's kind of overkill..." |
So it is fitting that this trope appears – and is roundly
subverted – in the Geonosis Arena, which is a Harryhausen tribute if ever there
was one. Of course, the fantastic beasts here are not stop-motion, but
computer-generated, and each a twisted reflection of the character it was meant
to kill. The feline Nexu, which like Padmé is small and lethal (and feminine).
The ceretopsian Reek, which like Anakin is powerful and attacking out of fear.
"Aren't we crabby today?" |
And Obi-Wan gets the crab-like Acklay which, like its
intended victim, is a far more calculating animal, knowing when to dodge and
when to strike. It’s fitting that it lasts longer in the ensuing battle than
any of the other animals.
"Stand still!" |
But we’re not there yet. The moment which I’ve been building
up occurs fairly early in the fight, when Obi-Wan has used the Acklay’s strike
to free himself from his chains but not yet his hand binds.
"Two days 'till retirement..." |
He steals a polearm from one of the Geonosian guards who is
then dispatched by the Acklay.
"Shake Spear(e)" |
Obi-Wan then goes into the familiar dance with the Acklay,
jabbing with the spear as the beast retreats and advances.
"Bullseye!" |
Finally, Obi-Wan does it. He throws the spear, and it hits
the creature square in the arm joint, which is if you remember the Instant Kill
Button in those classic films. Except we’re not watching those films, are we?
"NOPE." |
Obi-Wan, clearly having watched the same films, is just as
surprised as we are.
"Oh $#!t!" |
Actually, I was more impressed by how Anakin dealt with the Reek.
ReplyDeleteI agree.
DeleteBoth this scene and the scene on Jabba's sail barge in ROTJ for me had symbolic feminist meanings in the way Padme and Leia are humiliated and how they over come that obstacle: Padme's is humiliated by the way some of her clothing is ripped of when the nexu scratches her, revealing her midriff and she's chained to a pole to die. Leia is in a revealing bikini and is chained to the perverted Jabba's throne with the possibility that her fate will be similar to Oola's. Yet these women take these chains and use them as weapons against their captors, a possible symbolic affront to the "male gaze" and female subjugation.
ReplyDeleteInteresting point, though kind of off-topic. Funny how many people remember it at face-value.
DeleteI have to watch the scene preceeding it again, but I don't remember the scratch causing the outfit to bear midriff. I want to say it was like that before they landed, but this feels wrong to me too.